Re: [glade--]Re: Gnomemm-2 support in glade--

"Erwin J. van Eijk" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnome.glademm
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 09:06:06AM +0200, Christof Petig wrote:

> >Tonight I was tinkering to get some basic gnomemm support in, but then
> >I realised that
> >a) you'd probably already been doing that
> not really (sorry!). I hardly find time to do anything but preparing our 
> 'open to the public' day next weekend.

Well, that's ok, it happens. Is that an open day for the 'weberei'
you're address belongs to? Into the family business?
 
> >b) if you weren't, you'd have some ideas on how to do it.
> first you need to set up a working configure.in/autogen.sh (that's 
> probably the hardest) for the generated project. If you manage to get 
> gettext working, a lot of people would be glad (it once worked as of 

I might; I have the basics for autogen.sh/configure.in sorta working.
I'm a bit 'uneasy' about supporting Gnome-1.0, 1.4 and 2.0 at the same
time. The code is turning quite ugly.

Gnomemm-2 has the tendency to put everything in separate libraries as
well as separate namespaces. Though cleaner in design, it's a big deviation
from the 'old' situation.

> gnome 1.0, but gnome 1.4 seems to be different - I never found 
> definitive docs - that's why I really look forward to gnome2).

I'll look into it, once I get an ordinary test-app to compile cleanly,
without gettext support.
 
> And last but not least the gnome menu support is really ugly (menubar.cc 
> IIRC). I rewrote a much cleaner one for the gtkmm menu support and the 
> gnome support need a rewrite too (Mostly applying the developed scheme).

Ack; I'll look into your code, and see how much adaption it needs for 
gnomemm.
 
> Sorry, I never IRC. But EMail should be fast enough since we live in the 
> same time zone.

That's absolutely true
 
> PS: Please CC the mailing list.

Sorry, I wanted your opinion first, before notifying the whole world ;-)

Grtz
EJ
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.