Re: [glade--]Re: Gnomemm-2 support in glade--
"Erwin J. van Eijk" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.glademm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 09:06:06AM +0200, Christof Petig wrote: > >Tonight I was tinkering to get some basic gnomemm support in, but then > >I realised that > >a) you'd probably already been doing that > not really (sorry!). I hardly find time to do anything but preparing our > 'open to the public' day next weekend. Well, that's ok, it happens. Is that an open day for the 'weberei' you're address belongs to? Into the family business? > >b) if you weren't, you'd have some ideas on how to do it. > first you need to set up a working configure.in/autogen.sh (that's > probably the hardest) for the generated project. If you manage to get > gettext working, a lot of people would be glad (it once worked as of I might; I have the basics for autogen.sh/configure.in sorta working. I'm a bit 'uneasy' about supporting Gnome-1.0, 1.4 and 2.0 at the same time. The code is turning quite ugly. Gnomemm-2 has the tendency to put everything in separate libraries as well as separate namespaces. Though cleaner in design, it's a big deviation from the 'old' situation. > gnome 1.0, but gnome 1.4 seems to be different - I never found > definitive docs - that's why I really look forward to gnome2). I'll look into it, once I get an ordinary test-app to compile cleanly, without gettext support. > And last but not least the gnome menu support is really ugly (menubar.cc > IIRC). I rewrote a much cleaner one for the gtkmm menu support and the > gnome support need a rewrite too (Mostly applying the developed scheme). Ack; I'll look into your code, and see how much adaption it needs for gnomemm. > Sorry, I never IRC. But EMail should be fast enough since we live in the > same time zone. That's absolutely true > PS: Please CC the mailing list. Sorry, I wanted your opinion first, before notifying the whole world ;-) Grtz EJ