Re: [glade--] Never use g++-2.95 with glademm/gtkmm2 !!!

Murray Cumming wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 12:22, Christof Petig wrote:
> 
>>>That seems like an over-reaction. There should be no problem if you use
>>>a default constructor.
>>>
>>
>>A default ctor for the base class IIRC.
>>
>>And in glade generated code the base class takes care of 
>>creating/configuring/adding the widgets (which is of course done in the 
>>ctor, so that you can access them in your custom class ctor).
> 
> 
> You mean that the glademm-generated class has no default constructor?

it has, but add() is called there. That's the problem.

> 
> 
>>A workaround would be to use an empty ctor and call an initialization 
>>method. But I don't plan to invest my time in this ugly hack (and its 
>>documentation) (it's better invested in using g++ 3.2).
> 
> 
> Well I suggest that you accept a patch if it's important enough to
> anybody.

Of course (though I would call absolutely requiring a method be called 
first in an user ctor an ugly hack). I love to totally ignore widget 
creation in user classes.

   Christof