Re: Re: glade code generation
Jon Cast <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.glade.devel,gmane.comp.gnome.glademm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20030309172129.867E64A5ED@jcomain> |
Bill Haneman <[email protected]> wrote: <snip> > I do believe that handler stub generation is useful. I advocate > improving it, not removing it. > Dissatisfactor with the UI generation code is what started the > discussion. Right. But AFAIR, no effective argument has been advanced against the UI generation code. Somewhat valid arguments have been advanced against generating stubs, though---and these have been used in the overall conversation. So, lest anyone lose sight of the fact that they apply /only/ to stub generation, I thought I'd throw that out. In any case, I'm curious what value you see in stub generation (over and above prototype generation, which can go into a non-modifiable file in C)? Jon Cast _______________________________________________ Glade-devel maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/glade-devel