Re: [glade--]Treeview no glademm

Susumu Yoshida schrieb:
> On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 11:26:52 +0100
> Christof Petig <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>>I think that treeview1->selection()->changed().connect is more 
>>appropriate. But there's no way to make glade* do that for you. Simply 
>>put that in your ctor.
> 
> My code is ...
> 
> window1.cc:37: treeview1->selection()->changed().connect(SigC::slot(*this, &window1::on_treeview1_selection_changed));

Sorry, dumb mistake. It's treeview1->get_selection()->signal_changed() .

>>>2.I selected the "select_cursor_row" signal and tried to compile the code
>>>  but failed. The error message I got is shown below.
>>
>>Perhaps glademm is generating the wrong signature. Do you already use 
>>the CVS version?
> 
> 
> I figured out that problem last night. It was glademm's bug as you mentioned.
> It codes a function of "void" return type while it should code one of "bool"
> return type.
> I fixed that problem manually and I was able to compile successfully.
> (But "select_cursor_row" signal was not what I wanted)
> 
> I am not using the CVS version yet. Is that problem already fixed 
> in the CVS version?

don't know. _You_ should be able to tell easily ;-)

    Christof

PS: The selected row is available via
  treeview1->get_selection()->get_selected()