RE: [glade--]CVS version of glademm

[email protected] Thu, 22 Jan 2004 14:39:06 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnome.glademm
Message-ID <258B0164D480D5118D900800062B385801C22C84@vihsx09a.vih.infineon.com>
I think you are wildy misunderstanding Christof. I don't think he is saying
that you should not be using GNOME on your desktop. I think he is saying
that you should not use the feature of glademm that generates gnomemm code
rather than just gtkmm code. I think.

Murray Cumming
www.murrayc.com
[email protected]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Susumu Yoshida
> Sent: Donnerstag, 22. Januar 2004 14:26
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: Christof Petig
> Subject: Re: [glade--]CVS version of glademm
> 
> 
> Hi Christof,
> 
> > Actually not using gnome will give you different autotools support. 
> > [The
> > non-gnome version is by me, the gnome version somewhat unmaintained]
> 
> > Sadly this is not the kind of problem to go away ... I 
> hunts me once a
> > quarter.
> 
> I want to keep using glademm so I would like to re-install 
> glademm (not CVS version). My project wouldn't progress 
> without it. I will fix wrong codes it generates manually. To 
> do that, if I just "make" glademm again and "make install", 
> will the CVS version (which doesn't work) be overwritten? 
> 
> Or do you think it's a bad idea to re-install glademm?
> Giving up using GNOME might be another idea, but I am not 
> sure if I can code without GNOME comfortablly.
> 
> -- 
> from Susumu Yoshida([email protected])
> Powered by Red Hat Linux 
> _______________________________________________
> glademm-list mailing list
> [email protected] 
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/glad> emm-list
>