RE: [glade--]CVS version of glademm
[email protected] Thu, 22 Jan 2004 14:39:06 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.glademm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <258B0164D480D5118D900800062B385801C22C84@vihsx09a.vih.infineon.com> |
I think you are wildy misunderstanding Christof. I don't think he is saying that you should not be using GNOME on your desktop. I think he is saying that you should not use the feature of glademm that generates gnomemm code rather than just gtkmm code. I think. Murray Cumming www.murrayc.com [email protected] > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Susumu Yoshida > Sent: Donnerstag, 22. Januar 2004 14:26 > To: [email protected] > Cc: Christof Petig > Subject: Re: [glade--]CVS version of glademm > > > Hi Christof, > > > Actually not using gnome will give you different autotools support. > > [The > > non-gnome version is by me, the gnome version somewhat unmaintained] > > > Sadly this is not the kind of problem to go away ... I > hunts me once a > > quarter. > > I want to keep using glademm so I would like to re-install > glademm (not CVS version). My project wouldn't progress > without it. I will fix wrong codes it generates manually. To > do that, if I just "make" glademm again and "make install", > will the CVS version (which doesn't work) be overwritten? > > Or do you think it's a bad idea to re-install glademm? > Giving up using GNOME might be another idea, but I am not > sure if I can code without GNOME comfortablly. > > -- > from Susumu Yoshida([email protected]) > Powered by Red Hat Linux > _______________________________________________ > glademm-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/glad> emm-list >