Re: [glade--] Could raw C++ pointers be eliminated?
Christof Petig <[email protected]> Wed, 20 Oct 2004 12:15:29 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.glademm |
|---|---|
| Organization | Adolf Petig GmbH & Co. KG |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Murray Cumming schrieb:
> Yes, RefPtr<> is not a general purpose smartpointer. But there are plenty
> of other general purpose smartpointers that can be used with gtkmm.
So (if I read correctly between the lines) you advise me to use
auto_ptr<> inside the ctor (and the class)?
Not that I'm opposed to it ...
Christof
_______________________________________________
glademm-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/glademm-list
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 251 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Debian - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFBdjrFng+R+0ucfO0RAi3ZAJ9n9xgHn5xz6ePvRBeOCgX8uIt7PQCff9oe jBSDyEyctXBn3ExNGNCHeRY= =bUCa -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----