[Fwd: RE: Re: [glade--] Could raw C++ pointers be eliminated?]
Christof Petig <[email protected]> Thu, 21 Oct 2004 13:33:53 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.gtkmm,gmane.comp.gnome.glademm |
|---|---|
| Organization | Adolf Petig GmbH & Co. KG |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
This decides it for me.
Christof
-------- Original-Nachricht --------
Betreff: RE: [gtkmm] Re: [glade--] Could raw C++ pointers be eliminated?
Datum: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 13:20:53 +0200
Von: Murray Cumming <[email protected]>
An: <[email protected]>
> Hmmm. Agreed. Hmmm. But ...
>
> Is it suitable enough to be used as a pointer to
> Gtk::Widgets? E.g. to
> make a ctor exception safe (destructing all already generated
> widgets)
> and destructing (non managed) member widgets in the dtor?
No.
_______________________________________________
gtkmm-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 251 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Debian - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFBd56ing+R+0ucfO0RAtYoAJ9Kq4Mav4Kt6NbQr1CcBW2xR6a87wCcCvEK J1SA2xd+oVR4qIdKO/9vdEU= =mfTe -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----