[glade--] Re: Removing GNOME 1 (was Re: orbit2cpp

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--===============0701166959==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="------------enig394B751188072B47031EFA7A"

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig394B751188072B47031EFA7A
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Nathanael Nerode schrieb:
> Steve Langasek wrote on debian-release:
> 
>>And glademm build-depends on libbonobouimm1.3-dev.  This may be a bug, but
>>the net result is that there's more here than just unused libraries.
> 
> 
> However, glademm also build-depends on libgnomemm-dev, which is uninstallable
> due (indirectly) to the removal of libpng10-0.  The plan according to
> debian-gtk-gnome is to remove all the GNOME 1 packages.  Most of them depend
> on gdk-imlib1, which depends on libpng10 and has no replacement.
> 
> So at this point I think glademm and orbit2cpp should be kicked out of
> etch, but libbonobo[ui]mm1.3 should be kicked out of unstable as well.
> 
> Shall I file a bug against ftp.debian.org?  Is the standard practice to
> file a bug per source package -- that seems like it will be a lot of bugs.
> Cc:ing debian-gtk-gnome.  It's probably desirable to request the removal
> of all the GNOME 1 libraries which depend directly or indirectly on gdk-imlib1
> *at once*, and such a request should come from debian-gtk-gnome regulars,
> who are perhaps best equipped to make such a list.
> 

There is no reason for glademm to build "depend" on libgnomemm-dev! It
simply tests libgnomemm for existance to provide a reasonable default
version. Since these days libgnomemm is rarely used (to say the least)
nobody would notice a missing default version.

File a bug against glademm to remove any build dependancy on any of the
gtk1/gnome1 libraries (the configure warnings are harmless, the
functionality is still fully usable), I simply hestitate to remove the
gtk1 functionality because it is still in use somewhere.

Isn't this clear enough:
AC_MSG_CHECKING([for gnome-- 1.x version (not needed)])

      Christof (who happens to be the glademm author)

PS: Anybody to cc about this?

--------------enig394B751188072B47031EFA7A
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFDOPJDng+R+0ucfO0RAnxwAKDRiv2ZfWsndcL+ALwexAUDAQnhVACgy2Ds
qtlKshZ+tI+k9UQ5KGg49UI=
=mRsB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enig394B751188072B47031EFA7A--

--===============0701166959==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
glademm-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/glademm-list

--===============0701166959==--