Re: [glade--] Glademm code and libglademm

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--===============1606778412==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="------------enigDA7E543C6E58BCBDD33D961F"

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enigDA7E543C6E58BCBDD33D961F
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Arthur schrieb:
> I've already asked this on gtkmm list and I would like to know your
> opinion, too.
> Is there any good avantage to use libglademm instead of Glademm
> generated code? Is it faster, easier to deal with in terms of coding?
> 
> Thank you. I will really appreciate your advice.
> 
> Arthur Maciel

My opinion on this:

- use libglademm if you want your users to edit the GUI
- use libglademm if you want to use gnome widgets (not maintained in
glademm)
- use glademm if you want to ship a _single_ binary with no dependancies
(except shared libraries). glademm will embed your icons and create
static code.

   Christof

PS: Sorry for the delay, the glademm list gets buried in spam, so it is
no fun checking it.

--------------enigDA7E543C6E58BCBDD33D961F
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFDT8x7ng+R+0ucfO0RAt3SAJ4wHfZ7VkrUd2T87iUOG4riIsnEvQCdExiO
RVXziPRvaWfkNc/VS9ScmuU=
=18OB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enigDA7E543C6E58BCBDD33D961F--

--===============1606778412==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
glademm-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/glademm-list

--===============1606778412==--