Re: linking against multiple *mm libraries

Thanks guys!

I guess I will have to build the wrappers from source myself, which
might not be a bad thing anyhow...

On a related topic, I have heard rumors of developers moving away from
Bonobo for technical reasons. Is there anyone on this mailing list who
can confirm this, and maybe give a short explanation on why and what
the alternatives are?

Thanks in advance
/john


On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 15:23:39 +1100, Bowie Owens <[email protected]> wrote:
> Murray Cumming wrote:
> 
> >You need to use libbonobouimm-2.6 (which would be in
> >libbonobouimm-2.5.*.tar.gz tarballs until it is API-stable). But there
> >don't seem to be any tarball releases of that yet. You should bug the
> >maintainer if he doesn't respond here.
> >
> >
> That's me isn't it. What little time I've had lately has been going into
> orbitcpp. I'm pretty close to finishing off some substantial changes and
> making a new release of orbitcpp. After that I'll take some time to look
> at the bonobo*mm stuff. I'll see what I can manage but it'll probably be
> a few weeks.
> 
> PS  If you want to get my attention, it's best to put bonobo somewhere
> in the subject line.
> 
> --
> Bowie Owens
> 
> CSIRO Mathematical & Information Sciences
> phone  : +61 3 9545 8055
> fax    : +61 3 9545 8080
> mobile : 0425 729 875
> email  : [email protected]
> 
>