Re: ANNOUNCE: Gossip 0.13
Richard Hult <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.gossip.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | Imendio AB |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi guys, Are using gnutls or openssl? Could you please try to add -lgcrypt to build and see if that changes anything? /Richard Paul van Tilburg skrev: > On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 02:35:24PM +0200, Keywan Najafi Tonekaboni wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Am Mittwoch, den 02.08.2006, 12:47 +0200 schrieb Paul van Tilburg: >>> On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 07:03:39PM +0200, Keywan Najafi Tonekaboni wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I built gossip and run it and couldn't connect to any account except >>>> google talk anymore. The error is "Authentication failed". With gossip >>>> 0.12 it's no problem. I test it with three different servers (from a >>>> friend, at work, and on localhost). All the server are jabberd 1.x >>>> servers. For the remote server I use SSL/TLS and on localhost no SSL. >>> I have the same problem. However it seems to be architecture-related >>> When I build & run Gossip CVS on x86 machines, it logs in fine. On >>> PowerPC I get 'authorisation failed'. >> Did I said I run Ubuntu Dapper on a PowerPC? Which distribution/OS do >> you use? > > I am using Debian GNU/Linux sid on PowerPC. > >> Yesterday I try to investigate with the help of Martyn to the problem. >> Because of privacy issues I send my mails directly to Martyn. > > I did so too. :) > >> A summary: >> >> - It's not a wrong password etc problem, the same credentials are used >> as before >> - gossip 0.10.2 and 0.12 works fine, again with the same credentials and >> on the same computer with the same environment (Ubuntu Dapper, loudmouth >> 1.0.3-0ubuntu1) >> - the problem is only with server, who authenticate via encrypted >> passwords (<digest/>) instead of plain text (<password/>). >> - It's not related to the server version. I test it with jabber.org and >> jabber.ru, which use ejabberd, but asks for authentication via <digest/> >> - Loudmouth seems not be responsible: loudmouth wasn't changed and >> examples works fine. > > I concur with all the above posed observations. > > Paul > -- Imendio AB, http://www.imendio.com/