Re: final account rework
Xavier Claessens <[email protected]> Tue, 03 Oct 2006 11:19:10 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.gossip.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1159867150.18909.1.camel@zdra-desktop> |
Le dimanche 01 octobre 2006 à 21:59 +0200, Xavier Claessens a écrit : > Le dimanche 01 octobre 2006 à 18:46 +0200, Xavier Claessens a écrit : > > Hi, > > > > I'm working on protocol specific UI for creating and editing accounts > > [1]. This work is made for HEAD and will be very useful for telepathy. > > > > One of the goal of this is removing the deprecated > > gossip_account_[get,set]_*() API and use instead the new API > > gossip_account_param_set(). I'm surprised there is not many places where > > the deprecated API is used, most of it is in my new > > gossip-account-jabber.[ch] module, that's why I'm thinking about > > removing this API completely now. > > > > For that I need one think: the protocol should create new accounts with > > default values for all parameters. Something like > > GossipAccount *gossip_protocol_create_account (GossipProtocol*); > > With telepathy it is already the protocol that creates new accounts and > > it already sets all parameters with default values (Eitan correct me if > > I miss understood the code). In telepathy we directly call > > gossip_telepathy_cmgr_new_account_from_protocol > > from protocol/telepathy/ which violate the libgossip abstraction. > > > > Is that a good idea if I implement all that in my next big account > > rework ? Maybe it's better to make many little patches than one big ? > > > > btw, new_account_window_get_account_info() has changed in last commit in > > the THELEPATHY branch and don't have the telepathy specific code > > anymore ! what happened ? > > > > Xavier Claessens. > > > > [1] http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=358099 > > > Here is a patch. Like that we can create a new account with all default > values for a particular protocol using: > gossip_session_new_account (session, GOSSIP_ACCOUNT_TYPE_JABBER); > It still needs a little work to not use properties in g_object_new but > uses gossip_account_param_set_full() instead, like that we can set a > flag for each parameter, this flag can be used in the UI to sort > optional parameters that can be hidden in a "advanced" > tab/dialog/expander or whatever will be the nicer way. > > Like always this is not very useful for HEAD but will be very cool for > telepathy. The patch is for HEAD since it doesn't depend directly on > telepathy. > > What do you think about ? > > Xavier. Ok so the work is continuing. The goal of this patch [1] is to get rid of gossip_account_set_* API. The problem that is solved with this patch is if we don't uses gossip_account_set_password for example we don't know what's the type of the "password" parameter. So we need to create all parameters with gossip_account_param_new when creating a new GossipAccount object. Once the parameters created with the good type and flag we can easily change the value with gossip_account_param_set which has the same syntax than g_object_set. I need some feedback to know if it's the right way to solve the problem. Thanks, Xavier. [1] http://users.skynet.be/Zdra/gossip-account.patch _______________________________________________ Gossip-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.imendio.com/mailman/listinfo/gossip-dev
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD4DBQBFIisO6dEBUn2qPAMRArCtAJjBBdlpK5BzLtR3yGPWRHTWtdJ7AJ4wBbp2 7VhwWXYBVyd2mwlJGo+4dg== =bmho -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----