Re: Re: [Telepathy] GossipProtocol problems
Xavier Claessens <[email protected]> Sun, 15 Oct 2006 13:47:28 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.gossip.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1160912848.6100.29.camel@zdra-desktop> |
Le dimanche 15 octobre 2006 à 12:27 +0200, Mikael Hallendal a écrit : > >>> 4) _is_valid_username, _get_example_username, _get_default_server and > >>> _get_default_port: doesn't seems to have an equivalent in telepathy... > >>> maybe it should be added to the specification ? > >> The default for anything that has a sensible default can be found in > >> ConnectionManager.GetParameters(). Sample values are mentioned in your > >> previous mail to the Telepathy list and the replies to it, but I'll repeat > >> for the benefit of other Gossip people: we don't have that functionality, > >> but perhaps we should. > >> > >> Validating parameters as best we can before actually attempting > >> registration would perhaps be a nice thing to add too. (I assume you're > >> looking for "live" validation as the user types in parameters?) > > > > Yeah would be nice to add a method which gets in argument a dictionary > > with all parameters/values and checks if values are correct, then return > > a dictionary with incorrect parameters/default-value (or > > corrected-value ?) > > As for some of the validation, I don't see a huge problem of having it > in Gossip. Gossip will know what backends it supports anyway and having > implementing some of these (preferably not default server/port) would be > okay to do within the Gossip code. We can make it in gossip but I think it make more sense in telepathy. Xavier. _______________________________________________ Gossip-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.imendio.com/mailman/listinfo/gossip-dev
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBFMh/Q6dEBUn2qPAMRAp0QAJ9q8nsBXz9TqB07CWgr4+B1prjkqgCggnse tI6FfTlXO8jlqttLRQsycrA= =0j5l -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----