Re: Help proposal for libgdamm

Your help would be much appreciated. Actually, I had difficulty even building libgda.

On 23 Jan 2020 15:25, Pavlo Solntsev via gtkmm-list <[email protected]> wrote:

Hi,&#13;

&#13;

I saw some recent activities in libgdamm repo. However, I checked and&#13;

it looks like the library can't be compiled because of changes in&#13;

libgda code. Would it be be possible to open issues for work that needs&#13;

to be done? I can help with porting some code. For now, I am cleaning&#13;

documentation for lilbgda and found that some API introduced in the dev&#13;

version (6.0) can be obsolete. Technically, this is not obsolete, since&#13;

we didn't have a stable version yet. For instance, a lot of DDL&#13;

operations were moved to the new GdaDB... module and having redundant&#13;

API is not the best approach. Anyway, I would like to coordinate work&#13;

on libgdamm if possible. Thanks.&#13;

&#13;

&#13;

_______________________________________________&#13;

gtkmm-list mailing list&#13;

[email protected]&#13;

https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list&#13;

_______________________________________________
gtkmm-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list