Re: gcc 11 compatibility?

On 2021-05-19 09:24, Mike Liao wrote:
> Thanks! I have manually changed all the bad constructors in those 
> header files, and it works now. Hope the next release of glibmm will 
> include those fixes in the repository :D
They are included in glibmm 2.66.1 and 2.68.1.
>
> On 5/19/21 1:18 AM, Kjell Ahlstedt wrote:
>> Den 2021-05-18 kl. 17:51, skrev Mike Liao via gtkmm-list:
>>> I've recently updated my gcc to version 11, and I can't compile my 
>>> project under thec++20 standard.
>>>
>>> Here is part of the errors gcc reports:
>>>
>>> /usr/include/glibmm-2.68/glibmm/variant.h:910:24: error: expected 
>>> unqualified-id before ‘)’ token
>>>   910 |   Variant<VariantBase>();
>>>       |                        ^
>>> /usr/include/glibmm-2.68/glibmm/variant.h:971:25: error: expected 
>>> unqualified-id before ‘)’ token
>>>   971 |   Variant< Variant<T> >();
>>>       |                         ^
>>> /
>>> Does this have anything to do with some new rules introduced in c++20?
>>>
>> Yes, C++20 is stricter in some  respects, and gcc 11 is more C++20 
>> compliant than gcc 10. Glib::Variant has been updated in the git 
>> repository, but not yet in any released version of glibmm. See 
>> https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glibmm/-/merge_requests/50
>
_______________________________________________
gtkmm-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list