Re: GUADEC 2016: length and schedule
David King <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.guadec |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi On 2015-11-05 19:03, Allan Day <[email protected]> wrote: >Until 2014, GUADEC had 4 core days. Then, this year, we switched to 3 >days. This was a bit of a challenge for the schedule: we just managed >to squeeze everything in, but only just. > >If we want to go down to two core days, we'll probably have to >radically rethink the schedule. Possibilities might involve cutting >the lightning talks, and/or cutting the length of the talks. It seems >like a good idea to talk about this early on. I have also been on the papers committee for the last couple of years. Given the general quality and freshness of talk proposals received, I can see little problem with dropping to only 2 core days. Reducing the length of time allocated to each talk would be my preference, if it is desirable to keep the same number of talks on the schedule. -- http://amigadave.com/ _______________________________________________ guadec-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/guadec-list
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 819 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWO6vhAAoJELDo4PCTCLTjX9wP/3GU7UMoNpmxeOO64mf9fyoL 6z5jL9OKwtB19Z9t4Fir+Kc4eFRGnSaiBP1Iwo0lM3bwgDrgwfiWArqcCd1JAfYn uUwT2NGWovqh04DxkLJTTlgIIi/WYxhI6bhGGPpmUkbcPafnW0aG+AXtOnAQcEbM u6Akz8VNtG9u143yZYigZqXnCfHOLYSp/NpzxH2JZg25E/Y3WgdUXXLIuka6m/s1 JU24rsnTKMyweekXL8s+ZMH99/7gZZYyId9qY+dTCQmvIK/Ema8ElQAygowPIKvC VcTXGTr+L/VGz0aEndPXoz/V1l16v1XvVeXt70aA1YFdDp3T+b8OHZNN4czQHtcb w5WRRg5g1RpNAcRMTGHOaQl4EmuHtSg4PNi022VSnNwx5oaBfD3WzMG65C2z2aiY k8GEhjnf7LUHlmPgMnOolva/u5uTDAtHTyJJ9KtKoXDeeTSVPct85yd15gx0YXpJ 6Xej+ZdUQeGJJpSHxQvRC+VMACBYhNzFwx9a/FRsyw4Jatb+TtvG1Hx8XUFGVFdv VFsjvdEinxMb5u/pwcjdHk3u8ZciXFTwrAQ/QbDreC6nCOxkZ9Jpw4bwA4N3qM/P RHJQQQkeHjGNqI23Xw73jVB2y2B2tWvYkf7o9vTS+lj6/bIYDtAKNMkE9rX7OzFc oF8rHC1V9Kmt6DaSUb49 =YpPT -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----