Re: GUADEC 2016: length and schedule

David King <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnome.guadec
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi

On 2015-11-05 19:03, Allan Day <[email protected]> wrote:
>Until 2014, GUADEC had 4 core days. Then, this year, we switched to 3
>days. This was a bit of a challenge for the schedule: we just managed
>to squeeze everything in, but only just.
>
>If we want to go down to two core days, we'll probably have to
>radically rethink the schedule. Possibilities might involve cutting
>the lightning talks, and/or cutting the length of the talks. It seems
>like a good idea to talk about this early on.

I have also been on the papers committee for the last couple of years.  
Given the general quality and freshness of talk proposals received, I 
can see little problem with dropping to only 2 core days. Reducing the 
length of time allocated to each talk would be my preference, if it is 
desirable to keep the same number of talks on the schedule.

-- 
http://amigadave.com/

_______________________________________________
guadec-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/guadec-list
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 819 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWO6vhAAoJELDo4PCTCLTjX9wP/3GU7UMoNpmxeOO64mf9fyoL
6z5jL9OKwtB19Z9t4Fir+Kc4eFRGnSaiBP1Iwo0lM3bwgDrgwfiWArqcCd1JAfYn
uUwT2NGWovqh04DxkLJTTlgIIi/WYxhI6bhGGPpmUkbcPafnW0aG+AXtOnAQcEbM
u6Akz8VNtG9u143yZYigZqXnCfHOLYSp/NpzxH2JZg25E/Y3WgdUXXLIuka6m/s1
JU24rsnTKMyweekXL8s+ZMH99/7gZZYyId9qY+dTCQmvIK/Ema8ElQAygowPIKvC
VcTXGTr+L/VGz0aEndPXoz/V1l16v1XvVeXt70aA1YFdDp3T+b8OHZNN4czQHtcb
w5WRRg5g1RpNAcRMTGHOaQl4EmuHtSg4PNi022VSnNwx5oaBfD3WzMG65C2z2aiY
k8GEhjnf7LUHlmPgMnOolva/u5uTDAtHTyJJ9KtKoXDeeTSVPct85yd15gx0YXpJ
6Xej+ZdUQeGJJpSHxQvRC+VMACBYhNzFwx9a/FRsyw4Jatb+TtvG1Hx8XUFGVFdv
VFsjvdEinxMb5u/pwcjdHk3u8ZciXFTwrAQ/QbDreC6nCOxkZ9Jpw4bwA4N3qM/P
RHJQQQkeHjGNqI23Xw73jVB2y2B2tWvYkf7o9vTS+lj6/bIYDtAKNMkE9rX7OzFc
oF8rHC1V9Kmt6DaSUb49
=YpPT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.