Re: conference software
Andreas Nilsson <[email protected]> Mon, 23 Oct 2017 12:32:35 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.guadec |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2017-10-20 03:26, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote: > LAS is looking to move to a new conference software. We would like to > move to OSEM (http://osem.io/). I realize there was some talk about > using whatever FOSDEM is using, but honestly that software is 8 years > old and nobody supports it. There is 5-6 dedicated people for OSEM. > So, I'm hoping to make an executive decision and move to OSEM. Even > better, LAS will be the first GNOME conference next year and so we > will be the first to move to the platform. Secondly, GNOME.Asia has > already used OSEM for the past couple of years. > > Your mission if you choose to accept is to not respond if you agree > with the decision, or if you have questions then please respond or if > you object say so and explain why. Once I have consensus, I will put > a request for getting OSEM setup on our infrastructure. Last time I used OSEM, it wasn't as straight forward to use as I would have hoped. Maybe it makes sense to take it for a trial run for LAS and then see if it makes sense to recommend it for the other conferences? Is the signup system in OSEM (and/or Pentabaf) very, how do I say it, concerned about itself? In the sense that it's overly formal, academic and complicated? - Andreas _______________________________________________ guadec-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/guadec-list