RE: A GNOME Bindings release set?

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnome.language-bindings
Message-ID <258B0164D480D5118D900800062B385801A05190@vihsx09a.vih.infineon.com>
I wrote:
> I am happy for any subset, as long as that subset follows the rules.
> 
> More practically, I think any binding should wrap libraries 
> in this order of
> priority:
> GTK+
> Libglade (it's silly to use GTK+ without libglade)

libgnomecanvas (though it could be later in the list)

> GConf
> gnome-vfs
> libgnomeui (Getting smaller all the time)
> libbonobo and libbonoboui (involves CORBA)

Murray Cumming
www.murrayc.com
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
language-bindings mailing list  [email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/language-bindings
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.