Re: Adding error reporting to GtkFileChooser
"Matthias Clasen" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.gtk+.devel.general,gmane.comp.gnome.language-bindings |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> > > > At the very least, we need a decision on this. > > It's really sucky, and it's our fault for tying GNOME to GTK. > > But I think we should get the API right; assuming we're not planning on > jumping to GTK/GNOME 3 any time soon, people are going to be using this > API in the wild for quite a while and we don't want it to be the only > part of GTK that sucks. No worries about that (it being the only part...). I would vote for adding _checked() variants of the 5 or 6 methods that need it. Also, we should do the error-less variants as #defines a la #define foo (a,b,c) foo_checked((a),(b),(c),NULL) that way, we keep the error-less variants out of the ABI. Tarballs will not have to be redone, but you'll have to rebuild the whole stack again (obviously). We can then quickly deprecate the error-less variants, but probably not for 2.4.0, to avoid possible DISABLE_DEPRECATED desasters. Matthias -- +++ NEU bei GMX und erstmalig in Deutschland: TÃV-geprüfter Virenschutz +++ 100% Virenerkennung nach Wildlist. Infos: http://www.gmx.net/virenschutz