Re: http://www.gtk.org/bindings.html

Murray Cumming <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnome.language-bindings
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mon, 2004-03-22 at 16:41, muppet wrote:
> Murray Cumming said:
> > It's a bit less vague now, so some of the information might be wrong,
> > but that's probably the only way to make people tell us the correct
> > information.
> 
> for Perl -- under GTK+-1.2, it may be appropriate to link to
> http://www.gtkperl.org, since that project supported GTK+ from 0.99 to 1.2.
> E.g., in the "Platform Bindings" section for Perl in the GTK+ 1.2 column,
> instead of "none", put an asterisk that links to the anchor around "Perl -
> GtkPerl" in the "Others" section.

OK. I accidentally removed it.

> Also, either "-" or a blank cell for "none" may help mitigate some of the
> visual density of the table.  And maybe a splash of color-coding for good
> measure.  :-)

Yes, I'll try that, though there's a difference between the known nones
and the unknowns, which I like to show.

> As for "complete" verus "almost complete" versus "supported" -- is that based
> on api coverage?  If so, what percentile is "Complete"?  Are there audits for
> completeness or does it work on the honor system?

Yes, mostly.

-- 
Murray Cumming
www.murrayc.com
[email protected]

_______________________________________________
language-bindings mailing list  [email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/language-bindings
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.