Re: http://www.gtk.org/bindings.html
Murray Cumming <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.language-bindings |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, 2004-03-22 at 16:41, muppet wrote: > Murray Cumming said: > > It's a bit less vague now, so some of the information might be wrong, > > but that's probably the only way to make people tell us the correct > > information. > > for Perl -- under GTK+-1.2, it may be appropriate to link to > http://www.gtkperl.org, since that project supported GTK+ from 0.99 to 1.2. > E.g., in the "Platform Bindings" section for Perl in the GTK+ 1.2 column, > instead of "none", put an asterisk that links to the anchor around "Perl - > GtkPerl" in the "Others" section. I've added gtkperl in the 2nd section, and linked to the top from there, because though people should never think there is no gtk2 perl binding, I don't think people care now whether there is a gtk+ 1.2 binding. > Also, either "-" or a blank cell for "none" may help mitigate some of the > visual density of the table. And maybe a splash of color-coding for good > measure. :-) Feel free to patch it. It's at gtk-web/bindings.html > As for "complete" verus "almost complete" versus "supported" -- is that based > on api coverage? If so, what percentile is "Complete"? Are there audits for > completeness or does it work on the honor system? It's all self-reported, with a little sanity-checking by me. I've added a description at the top. -- Murray Cumming www.murrayc.com [email protected] _______________________________________________ language-bindings mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/language-bindings