Re: Plans for 2.8 - GNOME Managed Language Services?
Murray Cumming <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.language-bindings,gmane.comp.gnome.desktop |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, 2004-03-28 at 18:46, Owen Taylor wrote: > There's no reason for most language bindings to have both support for > GObject properties and setters and getters; the main reason we do it in > C is that property setting is not type safe, but there isn't even > a big performance advantage for going through the setter/getter; > the property still has to be looked up to do change notification. I thought that some set_() functions do extra work, such as checking, but maybe I'm getting confused with signal-invoker functions. It would be nice to remove the duplication in gtkmm for properties. -- Murray Cumming www.murrayc.com [email protected] _______________________________________________ language-bindings mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/language-bindings