Re: GNOME 2.7/2.8 Proposed Schedule

Luis Villa <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnome.desktop,gmane.comp.gnome.language-bindings
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sat, 2004-04-24 at 21:09 +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> <quote who="Markus Bertheau">
> 
> > В Сбт, 24.04.2004, в 05:56, Jeff Waugh пишет:
> > 
> > > Here's a cal(1) rendition of the schedule which you can quote in
> > > replies. :)
> > 
> > There's no "Patch review" and "Bugzilla cleaning" period - A lot of good
> > patches sleep in bugzilla and GNOME loses a lot of potential maintainers
> > that could lift the load of the current maintainers. I think it's a worthy
> > goal for 2.7 to tackle.
> 
> Hi,
> 
> My first thought is that patch review and bugzilla cleaning are open-ended
> tasks worked on between the bugsquad and maintainers throughout the process.
> It sure needs more *attention*, but I'm not sure it needs more *process*,
> which is what the schedule and release team do. ;-)
> 
> So I would kinda back away from enshrining these things in process (*unless*
> the bugsquad wants it!), but we really do need to figure out a good way to
> encourage these things. Perhaps the bugsquad could pay special attention to
> patch bugs on certain bug days?
> 
> [ This is not a final answer, only my opinion, etc. :-) ]

I agree that generally bugzilla cleaning is an ongoing process, and I'm
not sure that enshrining it in the schedule makes sense- especially
since new bugs come in all the time; people should (as Jeff says) always
be doing these things.

Patches are maybe a different problem, though- there are so many, and
not reading them is /so/ detrimental to what we are trying to do, that
maybe a week or two near the beginning of the schedule where bugsquad
devotes some days, and where maintainers get really actively nagged
about them, wouldn't be a bad thing. I worry, though, that saying 'this
is patch review time' means they'll be neglected the rest of the cycle-
maybe making it counterproductive.

At any rate, I'd say this can't be scheduled right now, though- someone
first needs to write an SQL query/report cgi that provides a good query
for maintainers for patches. Hopefully I will find time for that soon
but I'm very busy ATM so I'm hoping someone else will find the time :/
If anyone wants to help with that, the rough details of what is needed
in the query are here:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138144#c6

Luis
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.