Re: [pygtk] gnome-python split proposal

  I just realized that there is a project called python-gtkextra, so
pygtk-extra is bound to cause some confusion.  Any ideas for alternative
names? Does gnome-python-extra sound good?  Any other idea?  Thanks.


A Sáb, 2004-08-28 às 18:07, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro escreveu:
>   I would like to know what the pygtk/gnome community thinks about
> splitting gnome-python, according to the following plan:
> 
>   - gnome-python keeps the modules that are part of gnome developer
> platform[1]:
> 	o gnome, gnome.ui, gnome.vfs, gnome.canvas
> 	o bonobo, bonobo.activation, bonobo.ui
> 	o gconf
> 
>   - We create a new pygtk-extra package containing everything else,
> including:
> 	o gnome.applet
> 	o gnome.nautilus
> 	o gtkhtml2
> 	o gnomeprint, gnomeprint.ui
> 
>     At this point we would have more liberty to add other useful modules
> to pygtk-extra, such as:
> 	o pygtksourceview
> 	o some libegg stuff (tray, recent-files, ...)
> 	o gtkspell
> 	o ...
> 
>   I believe this split leaves gnome-python in a better position for
> inclusion in the next gnome bindings release.
> 
> [1] http://www.gnome.org/start/2.7/platform/
> 
>   Regards.
-- 
Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro
<[email protected]> <[email protected]>
The universe is always one step beyond logic

_______________________________________________
language-bindings mailing list  [email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/language-bindings