Re: gnome-python split proposal
Christian Robottom Reis <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.gtk+.python,gmane.comp.gnome.language-bindings |
|---|---|
| Organization | Async Open Source, Brazil |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, Aug 28, 2004 at 06:07:59PM +0100, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote: > I would like to know what the pygtk/gnome community thinks about > splitting gnome-python, according to the following plan: > > - gnome-python keeps the modules that are part of gnome developer > platform[1]: > o gnome, gnome.ui, gnome.vfs, gnome.canvas > o bonobo, bonobo.activation, bonobo.ui > o gconf > > - We create a new pygtk-extra package containing everything else, > including: > o gnome.applet > o gnome.nautilus > o gtkhtml2 > o gnomeprint, gnomeprint.ui Given that most/all packages are gnome-dependent, we should probably just have gnome-python-extra include the gnome bits we want, and leave pygtk-extra for whenever it becomes necessary. People could request addition of pygtk-only modules in gnome-python-extra for now if they wanted "official" distribution from pygtk.org. > I believe this split leaves gnome-python in a better position for > inclusion in the next gnome bindings release. Agreed 100%. Murray will be proud <wink>. Take care, -- Christian Robottom Reis | http://async.com.br/~kiko/ | [+55 16] 3361 2331 _______________________________________________ pygtk mailing list [email protected] http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/