Re: [pygtk] gnome-python split proposal
JustFillBug <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.language-bindings,gmane.comp.gnome.gtk+.python |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2004-08-28, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro <[email protected]> wrote: > I just realized that there is a project called python-gtkextra, so > pygtk-extra is bound to cause some confusion. Any ideas for alternative > names? Does gnome-python-extra sound good? Any other idea? Thanks. > pygtk-addon, python-gnome-plus, python-gnome-sharp, python-gnome-pound-sign (TM), python-gnome-vender, python-gnome-world, python-gnome-hello-world? Anyway, I hope some convenient routines floating around the pygtk list can be included in the extra modules. This will maximize the code reuse and efficiency to all kind of developers. Of course there should be a good review process on which routine should be included and how the APIs should look like. Good documentation should be a prerequisite. Maybe a pygtk-utils/cookies module for this purpose. _______________________________________________ language-bindings mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/language-bindings