Re: Freeze break request: Some API additions

On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 00:34 +0100, Torsten Schoenfeld wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 00:21 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
> 
> > > Of course, all of the above will be tested as part of our test suites.
> > 
> > Which of these can not wait for 2.11/12?
> 
> Well, *technically* they could all wait for the next cycle.  But it
> would be really tragic if our users weren't able to use those methods
> for half a year just because we were blind or the lacked the time to
> implement them.
> 
> > These additions will not disturb existing applications, but I worry
> > that you don't have time to check that the API is correct before it's
> > really frozen.
> 
> I think that's unfounded because we have tests (included in the patches)
> for every change that ensure that they all do exactly what they're
> supposed to do.

You can never be sure that you've tested everything, but that's far more
than I expected, so here's 1 of 2 approvals. Thanks for being careful.

-- 
Murray Cumming
[email protected]
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com

_______________________________________________
language-bindings mailing list  [email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/language-bindings