Re: Introspection API
Colin Walters <[email protected]> Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:53:29 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.gtk+.devel.general,gmane.comp.gnome.language-bindings |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 15:20 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote: >I have written up a draft spec for the format of the binary metadata >to back up the repository api which I posted earlier. I hope to have >some initial code implementing both of these soon. guint caller_owns_return_value : 1; Do we also want to have a pointer to a "release function"? I assume with XPCOM since it's C++ they can just use "delete", but we can't do that, right? Also, I think it would be nice if we had a standard way to map from a FunctionBlob -> possible GError domains it throws. Or maybe even a set of specific domain/code pairs. Or should that just be a standard annotation or something? _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCHj7JOIkJWWp2WGURAswoAJ9Pi3839Tgj/6zHxU5+U+duNSwdIgCfaG9k +o5jsZSZrcX7WVJqo+GHltU= =o2JV -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----