Re: GObject-Introspection 0.5.0
"Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen" <[email protected]> Mon, 8 Sep 2008 07:42:43 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.gtk+.devel.general,gmane.comp.gnome.language-bindings |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
2008/9/7 Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]>: > >>> I'm leaning towards using the "ownership" terminology instead of "transfer". >>> typedef enum { >>> GI_OWNERSHIP_CALLER, /* caller owns it, caller should free it after use */ >>> GI_OWNERSHIP_CALLEE /* callee owns it, caller should leave it as it is */ >>> } GITypeOwnership; >> >> Just as a nitpick, these two names look very similar and quite confusing >> for non-native English speakers. Maybe you could come up with something >> different, especially in place of 'callee'? > > It's actually commonly-used terminology, e.g. "caller-save registers" > vs. "callee-save registers" in compilers. With all due respect I am not sure compiler-writers are the main audience of GObject Introspection. I for one find the terminology a bit confusing too. -- Cheers, Mikkel