Re: gnome-libs compilation fails - Berkeley db issue
Geert Poels <[email protected]> Sat, 18 May 2002 14:51:21 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.lib.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
hi Wayne, Thanks for this input. Using 'set branch' works on 1.0, 1-0, basically everything. So I enter 1-0, do a set branch and those files listed should be the gnome-libs under development ? Currently stable version 1.4.1.6 is obtained from this 1-0 branch ? Geert >hi, > >I think gnome-libs HEAD CVS is a dead end branch. > >The real 1.4 gnome libs is in gnome-libs-1-0 branch. > >ta, >wayne > >On Sat, 2002-05-04 at 23:20, Geert Poels wrote: > > As somebody suggested, I took the cvs version. > > http://cvs.gnome.org/bonsai/rview.cgi?cvsroot=/cvs/gnome&dir=gnome-libs > > > > I noticed INSTALL instructions disappeared, maybe off for a rewrite ? > > > > Autoconf ((GNU Autoconf) 2.53) still generates errors. > > configure.in:6: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_CONFIG_HEADER > > configure.in:37: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE > > configure.in:54: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_PROG_LIBTOOL > > configure.in:56: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_MAINTAINER_MODE > > configure.in:124: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_CONDITIONAL > > configure.in:134: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_GNOME2_GETTEXT > > configure.in:223: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_CHECK_UTMP > > > > I'm probably using it the wrong way. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > gnome-libs-devel mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-libs-devel