Re: gnome-libs compilation fails - Berkeley db issue

Geert Poels <[email protected]> Sat, 18 May 2002 14:51:21 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnome.lib.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
hi Wayne,

Thanks for this input.
Using 'set branch' works on 1.0, 1-0, basically everything.
So I enter 1-0, do a set branch and those files listed
should be the gnome-libs under development ?

Currently stable version 1.4.1.6 is obtained from this 1-0 branch ?

Geert



>hi,
>
>I think gnome-libs HEAD CVS is a dead end branch.
>
>The real 1.4 gnome libs is in gnome-libs-1-0 branch.
>
>ta,
>wayne
>
>On Sat, 2002-05-04 at 23:20, Geert Poels wrote:
> > As somebody suggested, I took the cvs version.
> > http://cvs.gnome.org/bonsai/rview.cgi?cvsroot=/cvs/gnome&dir=gnome-libs
> >
> > I noticed INSTALL instructions disappeared, maybe off for a rewrite ?
> >
> > Autoconf ((GNU Autoconf) 2.53) still generates errors.
> > configure.in:6: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_CONFIG_HEADER
> > configure.in:37: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE
> > configure.in:54: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_PROG_LIBTOOL
> > configure.in:56: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_MAINTAINER_MODE
> > configure.in:124: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_CONDITIONAL
> > configure.in:134: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_GNOME2_GETTEXT
> > configure.in:223: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_CHECK_UTMP
> >
> > I'm probably using it the wrong way.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > gnome-libs-devel mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-libs-devel