Re: extended zvt widget

On Tue, 2002-04-30 at 00:15, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> 
> Cristiano De Michele <[email protected]> writes:
> > 
> > Havoc what should I do with my zvt patches? maybe should we
> > commit them? so that using profterm people can also them
> > or you think this way is dangerous (though I don't think
> > so ;-) or you're not interested in...
> 
> It would be nice as Jacob says to get a separate patch for each issue
> being fixed, ideally...
> 
> I'm not sure I have time to maintain libzvt at all, so I'm kind of
> hoping maybe Jacob can review the patches... I'm really really
> definitely not the lizvt maintainer. ;-)
> 
> My .02 is that it's risky to apply any patch to HEAD which isn't
> fixing a showstopper bug.
> 
> Havoc

sadly I think I'll have no time to separate all bugs
as J. suggested, and I think it's quite boring too and
maybe not feasible because I, as I said, I rewrote a lot of
things...

				
-- 
  Cristiano De Michele,
  Department of Physics,
  University "Federico II" of Naples