Re: [Fwd: GUADEC cancelled due to beer shortage]

On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 09:21 +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 04:42, Ben Martin wrote:
> > On Sun, 2004-06-27 at 22:39 +0100, Dave Cridland wrote:
>  
> > > LDAP, fine - it's designed as 'the one true data', but it can be 
> > > coerced, just about, into handling per-person data, even if getting 
> > > updates is a pain.
> > 
> > If you dig way way back into the GConf archives, probably a few years,
> > you should find a patch that provides an LDAP backend. It is written for
> > GConf 1.x but shouldn't be too hard to port across. I don't think I had
> > notifications working in it, it was a first patch for read/writing
> > values into LDAP which didn't seem to get interest at the time. It has
> > been since mentioned that it would be an acceptable patch for GConf but
> > my interest in updating it has since been usurped by other projects.
> 
> 	Kris Rietveld also started another implementation more recently:
> 
>   http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107926
> 
> Cheers,
> Mark.

Good to see that the idea of an LDAP backend is still being hacked on,
though that bugzilla page doesn't seem to have many updates :/

_______________________________________________
gconf-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gconf-list

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBA4kk8sIKOrI+5WvMRAsL+AKCyVfXNBAFh8AA8Q2oAi0mxw2TrsQCglQoA
LmTVduq4q4GMb691HIRhyTA=
=QfS1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----