Re: Preparing GConf for the next generation (D-Conf related)

Dave Cridland <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.xdg.devel,gmane.comp.freedesktop.dbus,gmane.comp.gnome.lib.gconf
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue Mar  8 13:28:33 2005, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> Of course, this is all much more boring than just hacking up something
> that you think is cool. I mean, the requirements could end up being
> something you dislike or disagree with! The truth is that standards work
> is boring tedious work.

While I largely agree with your email, one caveat:

The requirements may also become impossible, or extremely difficult, to actually put into code - it's happened before with standards - indeed standards relating to configuration access protocols.

Disliking or disagreeing with something because you've tried to code it and failed (or found it painful) is very useful information indeed.

Dave.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.