Re: proposed architecture evolutions for GConf

On Sat, 2006-11-11 at 22:24 +0800, Davyd Madeley wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-11-11 at 12:02 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> 
> > There are several ways to deal with a single-session, single-host
> > configuration engine. Real problems arise when the user can log in
> > several times on different machines, with a shared filesystem. With the
> > number of corporate users working over NFS, this is not something we can
> > ignore.
> 
> It is possible to write alternative GConf backends. I recall that Sun
> have written one that uses LDAP, its name starts with an A, but I can't
> recall what it is.

Failing that there is always this LDAP backend, though it probably needs
some love to bring it forward to recent GConf API :/

http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gconf-list/2000-November/msg00020.html

_______________________________________________
gconf-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gconf-list

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBFVeQLsIKOrI+5WvMRArebAJ9KOE3uasJVVf7l5aAP0Mtg80/E2wCgi3PG
gk0vNnaiiRelYX703pK6IrU=
=JTfv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----