Re: MIT License question
Daniel Veillard <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.lib.xml.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, It seems to me most companies (smartphones, car entertainment systems,...) just pick the libxml2 and libxslt licances for display as coming from the distributions. But I am not a lawyer, and this is not a legal advice, check your lawyers for a real answer, and considering your business I'm sure you have tons of those :-( Daniel On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 01:02:19PM -0700, Brad Wait wrote: > Hi, > > Our product uses libxml2 and these components: > > - sort > - trio > - xslt > > > Is it sufficient to include the main libxml2 MIT License (with its various > copyright owners etc).to cover each of these components? Or, are there > separate licenses for each? If the latter, where can I find these? > > Thanks > Brad > _______________________________________________ > xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/ > [email protected] > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml -- Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Developers Tools http://developer.redhat.com/ [email protected] | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/