Re: [PATCH] Doc: do not mislead towards "infeasible" scenario wrt. xmlBufNodeDump

Jan Pokorný via xml <[email protected]> Fri, 9 Aug 2019 00:00:08 +0200

Newsgroups	gmane.comp.gnome.lib.xml.general
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

On 11/07/19 20:00 +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote:
> I've run into a source of frustration based on an unset advice
> in the documentation that I hope to remove with this change.
> Or did I overlook something?  Thanks for pulling otherwise!
> 
> (Indeed, there could be substantially bigger cut, like possibly
> retargeting xmlBufCreate as public, etc. but no wonders if there's
> not much will for that once the status quo lasted so long...)

Also submitted as a merge request for more persistent tracking
and possible discussion:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libxml2/merge_requests/30


(As an aside, RelaxNG seems not to be in shape when any advanced
grammar constructs are present, i.e., not just a matter of performance
but rather the correctness of validation:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libxml2/merge_requests/31)

-- 
Jan (Poki)

_______________________________________________
xml mailing list, project page  http://xmlsoft.org/
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 819 B)