Re: GNU gettext vs. other implementations (was: Re: Status for the UTF-8 file detection)

--g3RkK9jYN81zD2N+
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 2003-08-11(Mon) 17:52:48 +0200, Carlos Perell=C3=B3 Mar=C3=ADn wrote:
> > Would it not make sense to discuss this on the public xml-i18n-tools
> > list instead of in private?
>=20
> Sorry, my fault.

<notAOL>me too.</notAOL>


> Although we were not trying to decide anything jet, we are talking with
> Sun guys (http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D119613) to know the
> actual status of SUN gettext. I don't know if there is another
> implementation that we should care about.

The discussion was about dropping intltool's support of glade 1 XML
file, in favor of the implementation from GNU gettext. Of course nothing
would be decided, it's just a discussion. In the end it'll be Kenneth to
decide the direction of intltool.

Abel


> And of course, we are not the intltool maintainer so Kenneth is who
> should take any decision. That's only my ideas.
>=20
> Cheers.
>=20
> >=20
> >=20
> > Christian
> > -- just worrying that things will be decided in private without insight
> --=20
> Carlos Perell=C3=B3 Mar=C3=ADn
> Debian GNU/Linux Sid (PowerPC)
> Linux Registered User #121232
> mailto:[email protected] || mailto:[email protected]
> http://carlos.pemas.net
> Valencia - Spain



--=20
Abel Cheung
Linux counter #256983   | http://counter.li.org
GPG Key: (0xC67186FF)   | http://deaddog.org/gpg.asc
Key fingerprint: 671C C7AE EFB5 110C D6D1  41EE 4152 E1F1 C671 86FF

--g3RkK9jYN81zD2N+
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/OAzKQVLh8cZxhv8RAg4/AJ0SQ5rUfqpJZHdAVv/Np0WV/8lNGgCfVPM9
eo95M37i0gepKq+SB+s7WE0=
=5/jU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--g3RkK9jYN81zD2N+--