Re: [Usability] Google Code-In 2011 time in hours

Andre Klapper <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnome.internationalization.general,gmane.comp.gnome.love,gmane.comp.gnome.usability,gmane.comp.gnome.bugsquad,gmane.comp.gnome.documentation,gmane.comp.gnome.desktop
Message-ID <1321528628.2345.16.camel@embrace>
Hi Andika, 

[For future responses, please strip the long CC list.]

On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 08:56 +0700, Andika Triwidada wrote:
> After you have converted all estimated time from days to hours, it
> seems that every task,
> even the simplest one, need much more time than initially. For
> instance, when I wrote
> a 2-days task of translating 'dictionary manual' into Indonesian, I
> was thinking of
> max two 8-hour days, not two 32-hour ones.

While I increased a few deadlines, you picked a bad example:
Your proposed timeframe for Dictionary Manual was "3-4 days", see
https://live.gnome.org/action/info/GoogleCodeIn/Tasks?action=diff&rev2=193&rev1=192#line-478
I turned your "4 days" into "100 hours". 
I think that's quite appropriate (4 hours more).

> Should each of us revise those time estimations?

No.

In general: It doesn't hurt anybody if a student hands in the work
earlier, plus having more time for reviews/iterations. 
Plus keep in mind the time it takes to set up infrastructure (e.g.
learning git, understand required applications etc, Learning curve, time
zones, etc).

andre
-- 
mailto:[email protected] | failed
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper | http://www.openismus.com
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.