Re: [Mono-dev] Monodoc

Monodoc would need a "profile chooser" or something like that to switch
between 1.x and 2.0 profile, right? Any plans on those things?

Btw anyone knows why the C# specification appears without newlines?

On 9/30/05, Miguel de Icaza <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> > When will monodoc be ready for .NET 2.0 classes? (ie, when will it
> > also allow to document generics)
>
> We will have to wait for someone to contribute the necessary code to
> cope with this. I have not had much time to look into this issue.
>
> What needs to be done is:
>
> * Look at the new ECMA XML documentation from ECMA and evaluate
> how we could bring those changes into our documentation.
>
> * Someone would have to port the new docs nonetheless.
>
> * Someone would have to architect the changes to the monodoc
> engine to do so.
>
> The right place to discuss this is the mono-docs-list.
>
> That being said, if you can not wait to write some documentation, we
> have a *lot* of stuff in the 1.x profile that needs documentation.
> Considering that 2.x stuff wont be 100% supported for a while, maybe it
> would be best to contribute to the 1.x effort.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mono-devel-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
>



--
Alexandre Gomes, Portugal

_______________________________________________
Mono-devel-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list