Re: Mono.Cecil dependency in monodocer
Miguel de Icaza <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.mono.documentation |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hey, > So, I've reverted all of my Cecil changes. This is a good opportunity > to use Cecil, so if Cecil makes it into a release, I think we should go > with it. Well, I did not say that we could not use Cecil. Only that if a Cecil dependency should be introduced, we should use the guidelines for doing so from the Application Deployment Guidelines. In short it means: bundle a copy of Mono.Cecil.dll in the distribution. We are already doing that with MonoDevelop (it distributes its copies of Stetic.dll). > For anyone: If monodocer is compiled with gmcs, is it still able to load > assemblies compiled against the 1.0 corlib? I don't have a grasp of how > assembly versioning works in .NET... (Yeah, I could try it.) The only downside is that you can not load two corlibs into memory at the same time, so it might not be usable to document mscorlib. Miguel. _______________________________________________ Mono-docs-list maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-docs-list