Re: Fwd: [Mono-winforms-list] Exception when using monodocer on System.Windows.Forms.dll
Miguel de Icaza <[email protected]> Wed, 20 Dec 2006 14:21:44 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.mono.documentation |
|---|---|
| Organization | Novell. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello, > Please don't forget to adapt the makefile to assemble the generated > documentation. Right now this is not being done in a generic way, every > documented assembly is hard coded into the Makefile.am. Am not sure I understand the problem. > This may be right but not providing the stubs in monodoc makes it impossible > for users to contribute documentation. That way at least a few things can be > documented. In addition I have to say that I agree to Jonathan stubs can be > usefull to since they provide the name of the argument, from which you can at > least imagine how to use the method correctly. There is something else that we need to keep in mind: it turns out that argument names in the ECMA spec are relevant. They are not purely for decorative purposes. This is a problem, because early on, we did not use the same arguments as Microsoft did, so we will have to go back and fix that at some point. _______________________________________________ Mono-docs-list maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-docs-list