Re: Intended Audiance of Developer ResourceCategory?
"markaoki" <[email protected]> Wed, 16 May 2007 23:48:26 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.mono.documentation |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
This is interesting. I hope to hear more on this discussion. If I am lucky I will be able to contribute to mono in a few weeks when my other Linux writing project is complete. I would love to write about mono:) have a good day, -yoshiro (mark) aoki ----- Original Message ----- From: "Adrien Dessemond" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 10:06 PM Subject: Re: [Mono-docs-list] Intended Audiance of Developer ResourceCategory? > Hello! > > >I've got a short and simple question. For whom is the Developer Resource > >Category for? People who want to develop apps by using Mono, or > >Mono-Hackers > >themselves? > > >If it is a mixup of both I would suggest to separate this into three > >categories. > >1. Developer Resource > >2. Mono Hacker Resources: For people hacking mono directly. > >3. Windows Porting > > This is good idea ! The pit to not fall into is to have a too > complicated structure at the end (the MSDN library suffers of that). > > Beyond your suggestion, could I express a more personal point of > view ? I apologize if was previously discussed and/or conflict with > some project orientations. I am curious to get some feedback about it > and by the way, may it will bring some ideas too. > > <personal point of view> > > I am following (from a far away point of view) the Mono project for > more than 2 years and started to seriously use Mono for a personal > project a couple a weeks ago. Because writing and dealing with > documentation is my everyday job, I was led to the following reflection : > > My personal and professional experiences told me that even you have > the most advanced/robust/complete/flexible product, it will rejected > by some of your users if it does not have robust (clear/concise/....) > and well-organized (logically organized / easily-browsable) documentation. > > To try to figure out my idea : imagine you are just curious to see > what Mono is. You launch your favorite browser, you type > www.mono-project.com in the URL bar et voila : the site has a very > nice look-and feel, downloads/blogs links are easy to reach, general > project information is easy to find and clear enough. > > Now come to site as a developper : you know what Mono is, you have > dowloaded and installed it. You have precise goals in mind about your > documentation search and no time to loose in guessing where the stuff > could be. If you wish to get the right thing right now... not very easy > :-(. > > From my point of view, the developer related documentation will need > a different approach sooner or later as Mono popularity, maturity and > user base are growing. You cannot afford to keep it scattered on many > pages with no clear linking and no easily browsable central point. > That will be a nightmare to maintain, a pain to consult and a huge > source of frustation. > > This new approach /could be/ a Wikipedia-like site but wholly > dedicated to Mono. Several reasons : > > 1 - We are very familiar with Wikipedia so using (say) Monopedia will > not require extra learning effort > 2 - A wiki usage is natural especially for a developper and offers a > high level a flexibility and diversity > 3 - Monopedia could follow the same philosophy as Wikipedia : > everyone can contribute freely in "real-time". > (3' - Writing and cross-referencing between articles is really simple) > 4 - The wiki documentation grows by itself in the background and > allow the Mono documentation team concentrate on other tasks. > > Do you think this kind of perspective could be compatible with the > Mono documentation project (short/long term) ? I welcome any > opinion/criticism :-) > > </personal point of view> > > Valentin, I would be very glad to help you and any Mono documentation > project efforts in manner or another. > > Kind regards, > > Adrien Dessemond > > _______________________________________________ > Mono-docs-list maillist - [email protected] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-docs-list > _______________________________________________ Mono-docs-list maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-docs-list