Re: monodoc Licensing

Jonathan Pryor wrote:
> Joshua et al,
> =

> You wrote and contributed to the monodoc module & many related
> utilities, such as monodocer, monodocs2html, etc., in addition to
> monodoc/engine and related documentation providers.
> =

> The monodoc module currently claims to be under the GPL, as does
> `monodocer --version` and monodocs2html.
> =

> How would you feel about relicensing these contributions under MIT/X11?
> =

> No major reason, aside from an eventual simplification of Mono's
> licensing policy from GPL/LGPL/MIT-X11 to LGPL/MIT-X11, and I don't see
> much reason to prevent non-GPL-compliant reuse of these libraries and
> apps...

Hey, Jon.

I'm fine with anything, and simplification is my middle name (or, at =

least, the point of my domain name). You can consider any of my =

contributions to monodoc in the public domain.

Best,

-- =

- Josh Tauberer

http://razor.occams.info

"Yields falsehood when preceded by its quotation!  Yields
falsehood when preceded by its quotation!" Achilles to
Tortoise (in "G=F6del, Escher, Bach" by Douglas Hofstadter)
_______________________________________________
Mono-docs-list maillist  -  [email protected]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-docs-list