Re: monodoc Licensing
Ben Maurer <[email protected]> Fri, 25 Jan 2008 14:42:42 -0500 (EST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.mono.documentation |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Jon, Long time, no talk. I hope you are doing well. MIT/X11 is fine for anything I've written in monodoc. -b On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Jonathan Pryor wrote: > Joshua et al, > > You wrote and contributed to the monodoc module & many related > utilities, such as monodocer, monodocs2html, etc., in addition to > monodoc/engine and related documentation providers. > > The monodoc module currently claims to be under the GPL, as does > `monodocer --version` and monodocs2html. > > How would you feel about relicensing these contributions under MIT/X11? > > No major reason, aside from an eventual simplification of Mono's > licensing policy from GPL/LGPL/MIT-X11 to LGPL/MIT-X11, and I don't see > much reason to prevent non-GPL-compliant reuse of these libraries and > apps... > > Thanks, > - Jon > > > > _______________________________________________ Mono-docs-list maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-docs-list