Re: monodoc Licensing

Ben Maurer <[email protected]> Fri, 25 Jan 2008 14:42:42 -0500 (EST)
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnome.mono.documentation
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Jon,

Long time, no talk. I hope you are doing well. MIT/X11 is fine for 
anything I've written in monodoc.

-b

On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Jonathan Pryor wrote:

> Joshua et al,
>
> You wrote and contributed to the monodoc module & many related
> utilities, such as monodocer, monodocs2html, etc., in addition to
> monodoc/engine and related documentation providers.
>
> The monodoc module currently claims to be under the GPL, as does
> `monodocer --version` and monodocs2html.
>
> How would you feel about relicensing these contributions under MIT/X11?
>
> No major reason, aside from an eventual simplification of Mono's
> licensing policy from GPL/LGPL/MIT-X11 to LGPL/MIT-X11, and I don't see
> much reason to prevent non-GPL-compliant reuse of these libraries and
> apps...
>
> Thanks,
> - Jon
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Mono-docs-list maillist  -  [email protected]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-docs-list