Re: monodoc Licensing

Sorry for answering late but I was on vacation.

Fine for me too

On 25/01/2008, Eric Butler <[email protected]> wrote:
> Fine with me too.
>   - Eric
>
> Ben Maurer wrote:
> > Hi Jon,
> >
> > Long time, no talk. I hope you are doing well. MIT/X11 is fine for
> > anything I've written in monodoc.
> >
> > -b
> >
> > On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Jonathan Pryor wrote:
> >
> >> Joshua et al,
> >>
> >> You wrote and contributed to the monodoc module & many related
> >> utilities, such as monodocer, monodocs2html, etc., in addition to
> >> monodoc/engine and related documentation providers.
> >>
> >> The monodoc module currently claims to be under the GPL, as does
> >> `monodocer --version` and monodocs2html.
> >>
> >> How would you feel about relicensing these contributions under MIT/X11?
> >>
> >> No major reason, aside from an eventual simplification of Mono's
> >> licensing policy from GPL/LGPL/MIT-X11 to LGPL/MIT-X11, and I don't see
> >> much reason to prevent non-GPL-compliant reuse of these libraries and
> >> apps...
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> - Jon
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
_______________________________________________
Mono-docs-list maillist  -  [email protected]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-docs-list