Re: Estado de mono 2.0

Si, pero yo no me preocuparia por eso ;-) siempre he instalado Mono
compilandolo desde el codigo fuente y nunca he tenido problemas. No has
pensado instalarlo asi?

2008/10/9 Alberto León <[email protected]>

> Es una pena porque en Debian los packages más actuales andan por la versión
> 1.9
>
> 2008/10/9 Daniel Soto <[email protected]>
>
> El instalador generico de Mono ya no va más. Ahora solo hay paquetes
>> binarios para distribuciones en especifico más el codigo fuente, desde mono
>> 2.0 que ya no corre más el instalador generico debido a que daba problemas.
>> Te copio un correo que se mando a la lista de Mono en ingles
>>
>> *[Mono-list] Mono support on Fedora, Ubuntu, Solaris, etc
>> *
>> ** *Andrew Jorgensen**para mono-announce-., mono-devel-list, mono-list *
>>
>> *The Mono Team is looking for volunteers to maintain packages for several
>> platforms.  We receive many bug reports and request for help which
>> ultimately turn out to be incompatibilities between the packages we build
>> and platforms we do not test them on.  The Generic Linux installer has
>> been especially problematic in this regard.
>>
>> Historically it was important for us to provide packages for distributions
>> that did not carry Mono.  With all major distributions already including
>> some version of Mono it's time to focus on ensuring that they include the
>> best version and that it's packaged in the best way.
>>
>> For these reasons we have decided that the Mono team will only release
>> binaries for platforms we test.  This includes the latest openSUSE (11.0),
>> the latest SuSE Linux Enterprise (SLE 10), Windows, and MacOSX.  The Generic
>> Linux installer has already been dropped.  This new policy will take
>> effect immediately and will impact the 2.0 release.
>>
>> This does not mean that we don't want Mono to run well on other
>> distributions. On the contrary we want to give our users and developers the
>> best experience possible.  The best way to do this is to have better
>> cooperation with members of the major distribution projects.
>>
>> Ideally we'd like to have each distribution provide packages for their own
>> releases.  For instance we would love to have an Ubuntu PPA with the latest
>> mono.  I don't know if Fedora has something similar but we can use the
>> openSUSE Build Service to build packages for RedHat derivatives if they
>> don't.  Our hope is that this will lead to better mono support on all the
>> major distributions.
>>
>> We are also looking for a volunteer who is passionate about Mono on
>> Solaris to maintain packages on Blastwave.
>>
>> If you are a packager for one of these projects and / or have the skills
>> to help in this way please contact me.  If possible we would like to have
>> packages for all these platforms available when 2.0 is released in late
>> September (more likely early October).
>>
>> Andrew Jorgensen
>> Mono / Moonlight Package Maintainer
>> *
>>
>> El 9 de octubre de 2008 4:08, Alberto León <[email protected]>escribió:
>>
>>> Si miráis el RoadMap dice que el 6 de octubre liberaron Mono 2.0.
>>> La descarga está disponible para casi todo excepto el linux_installer.bin
>>> que estoy utilizando para instalar Mono en Debian.
>>>
>>> ¿Alguien sabe dónde puedo conseguir el linux installer de MOno 2.0 de la
>>> última versión?
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Mono-hispano mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://listas.hispalinux.es/mailman/listinfo/mono-hispano
>>>
>>
>>
>

_______________________________________________
Mono-hispano mailing list
[email protected]
https://listas.hispalinux.es/mailman/listinfo/mono-hispano