Re: Estado de mono 2.0

Ahora mismo probe este manual:

http://zephid.dk/2008/04/27/installing-mono-and-lighttpd-on-debian/

espero te sirva.

2008/10/9 Gary Ariel Sandi Vigabriel <[email protected]>

> En esta dirección puedes ver su estado.
>
> http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/DebianMonoGroup
>
>
>
> 2008/10/9 Gary Ariel Sandi Vigabriel <[email protected]>
>
>> bueno, te sugiero entonces esperar la salida en la rama experimental, yo
>> tambien tengo ancias de probar algunas cosas, pero tengo q esperarme esa
>> dichosa salida en los repositorios experimentales.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Alberto León <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> No, es por experimentar con cosas que le faltaban a ASP.NET de Mono.
>>>
>>> 2008/10/9 Gary Ariel Sandi Vigabriel <[email protected]>
>>>
>>> Entonces tal vez solo deberias esperar, este fin de semana se lanzan los
>>>> paquetes de mono 2.0 en la rama experimental de Debian.
>>>> Es sumamente urgente?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2008/10/9 Alberto León <[email protected]>
>>>>
>>>>> He estado echando un vistazo a eso. Lo hice hace tiempo y la lie con
>>>>> las dependencias. Compilando muchisimas. Me había acostumbrado al instalador
>>>>> porque me iba todo de perlas. Me sabía ya como corregir esos pequeños bugs
>>>>> que originaba el instalador.
>>>>>
>>>>> Conocéis algún buen tutorial de cómo compilar los fuentes, me interesa
>>>>> especialmente para xsp2 y mod_mono.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2008/10/9 Daniel Soto <[email protected]>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Si, pero yo no me preocuparia por eso ;-) siempre he instalado Mono
>>>>>> compilandolo desde el codigo fuente y nunca he tenido problemas. No has
>>>>>> pensado instalarlo asi?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2008/10/9 Alberto León <[email protected]>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Es una pena porque en Debian los packages más actuales andan por la
>>>>>>> versión 1.9
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2008/10/9 Daniel Soto <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> El instalador generico de Mono ya no va más. Ahora solo hay paquetes
>>>>>>>> binarios para distribuciones en especifico más el codigo fuente, desde mono
>>>>>>>> 2.0 que ya no corre más el instalador generico debido a que daba problemas.
>>>>>>>> Te copio un correo que se mando a la lista de Mono en ingles
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *[Mono-list] Mono support on Fedora, Ubuntu, Solaris, etc
>>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>>> ** *Andrew Jorgensen**para mono-announce-., mono-devel-list,
>>>>>>>> mono-list *
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *The Mono Team is looking for volunteers to maintain packages for
>>>>>>>> several platforms.  We receive many bug reports and request for help which
>>>>>>>> ultimately turn out to be incompatibilities between the packages we build
>>>>>>>> and platforms we do not test them on.  The Generic Linux installerhas been especially problematic in this regard.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Historically it was important for us to provide packages for
>>>>>>>> distributions that did not carry Mono.  With all major distributions already
>>>>>>>> including some version of Mono it's time to focus on ensuring that they
>>>>>>>> include the best version and that it's packaged in the best way.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> For these reasons we have decided that the Mono team will only
>>>>>>>> release binaries for platforms we test.  This includes the latest openSUSE
>>>>>>>> (11.0), the latest SuSE Linux Enterprise (SLE 10), Windows, and MacOSX.  The
>>>>>>>> Generic Linux installer has already been dropped.  This new policy
>>>>>>>> will take effect immediately and will impact the 2.0 release.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This does not mean that we don't want Mono to run well on other
>>>>>>>> distributions. On the contrary we want to give our users and developers the
>>>>>>>> best experience possible.  The best way to do this is to have better
>>>>>>>> cooperation with members of the major distribution projects.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ideally we'd like to have each distribution provide packages for
>>>>>>>> their own releases.  For instance we would love to have an Ubuntu PPA with
>>>>>>>> the latest mono.  I don't know if Fedora has something similar but we can
>>>>>>>> use the openSUSE Build Service to build packages for RedHat derivatives if
>>>>>>>> they don't.  Our hope is that this will lead to better mono support on all
>>>>>>>> the major distributions.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We are also looking for a volunteer who is passionate about Mono on
>>>>>>>> Solaris to maintain packages on Blastwave.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If you are a packager for one of these projects and / or have the
>>>>>>>> skills to help in this way please contact me.  If possible we would like to
>>>>>>>> have packages for all these platforms available when 2.0 is released in late
>>>>>>>> September (more likely early October).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Andrew Jorgensen
>>>>>>>> Mono / Moonlight Package Maintainer
>>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> El 9 de octubre de 2008 4:08, Alberto León <[email protected]>escribió:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Si miráis el RoadMap dice que el 6 de octubre liberaron Mono 2.0.
>>>>>>>>> La descarga está disponible para casi todo excepto el
>>>>>>>>> linux_installer.bin que estoy utilizando para instalar Mono en Debian.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ¿Alguien sabe dónde puedo conseguir el linux installer de MOno 2.0
>>>>>>>>> de la última versión?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> Mono-hispano mailing list
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>> https://listas.hispalinux.es/mailman/listinfo/mono-hispano
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Mono-hispano mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> https://listas.hispalinux.es/mailman/listinfo/mono-hispano
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Atte:
>>>> Gary Ariel Sandi Vigabriel
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Atte:
>> Gary Ariel Sandi Vigabriel
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Atte:
> Gary Ariel Sandi Vigabriel
>



-- 
Atte:
Gary Ariel Sandi Vigabriel

_______________________________________________
Mono-hispano mailing list
[email protected]
https://listas.hispalinux.es/mailman/listinfo/mono-hispano