Re: gnome-cd
Leonardo Pereira <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.multimedia |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--- "Ronald S. Bultje" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 20:59, Leonardo Pereira wrote: > > I was reading some past messages of this list and > have > > read that are some projects to purge gnome-cd of > > gnome-media and put sound-juicer in its place. My > > question is: Why sound-juicer? It has a ugly > interface > > and add a play button will not do it a good > cd-player. > > I think that we already have better options, like > > goobox, that already is player and a ripper, it > has a > > beautiful interface. > > I love flames. I don't love flames, but, sometimes, we need to ask for the best. > > S-J is part of the GNOME desktop, so it surely can't > be that bad. "http://www.gnome.org/projects/" doesn't have Sound-Juicer, if you are talking about the fact that Sound-Juicer uses libgnome, libglade and gstreamer, Goobox and others cd-players do the same. > Gnome-CD sucks, people agree on that. Even I, the > gnome-cd maintainer, wholeheartedly admit that > gnome-cd is a violation of the human right for > pretty software. I agree that gnome-cd is sucks, but I don't agree that sound-juicer isn't sux. > > Next step is obvious. And so we did. If you prefer > goobox, then use > goobox. We don't want to limit you, we just want to > eradicate ugly > software, and gnome-cd definitely is ugly. I am not saying that gnome-cd isn't ugly and that it can not be removed from GNOME. But I want to see a good program on its place, not another ugly software. Did you have done any research about what people think about Sound-Juicer and if they know another good cd-player? > > Ronald > > -- > Ronald S. Bultje <[email protected]> > > Leonardo Lopes Pereira ____________________________________________________ Yahoo! Sports Rekindle the Rivalries. Sign up for Fantasy Football http://football.fantasysports.yahoo.com