Volume widget comments

Rui Tiago Cação Matos <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnome.multimedia
Message-ID <1173384387.6901.0.camel@hive>
Hi all,

I'm going to discuss here about what I said in comment 12 on
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=415775


> Comment #13 from Aaron Bockover  (developer, points: 15) 
> 2007-03-08 00:08 UTC [reply]  
> The widget does allow for clicking and then adjusting the volume, like a normal
> scale. It also allows click+drag+release to adjust. It has a tooltip to show
> the actual volume level and the theme icons do a decent job of showing relative
> volume level (mute, min, med, max).
> 
> If this widget were like F-Spot's zoom widget, there would be no widget - you'd
> just use a regular slider. Part of the point of this widget is to be more
> compact and it also looks nicer than a constantly exposed slider. I do not
> think there's room for showing a standard slider in Rhythmbox, Banshee, or
> Totem. That area should be consumed (at least in RB and Banshee) by metadata,
> etc.
> 
> I don't think this widget is any less usable than a regular slider.


> Comment #14 from Ronald Bultje  (developer, points: 21) 
> 2007-03-08 00:19 UTC [reply]  
> It's actually more usable. B/c of the icon, you get instant information on what
> the button does. Since all (media) apps share it, it's a learn-once-use-always
> thing for users, too.
> 
> A slider is just a slider, like all the million other sliders on GNOME, e.g.
> the brightness slider in gimp, the quality slider in banshee's vorbis encoder,
> etc. I just looked at the f-spot screenshots to see what you're talking about
> and I still haven't been able to figure out which slider in f-spot is supposed
> to be the zoom slider, and I'm a programmer!
> 
> Anyway, this discussion has been had before in the totem bug report, please
> re-read that and let's leave this bug report for the potential inclusion of
> this widget in gtk+.

Well I do think that [1] and [2] do look a lot better and are much more
self explanatory. In particular iTunes' interface delivers the same, if
not more, information and functionality in less area than rhythmbox's. I
think the latter[3] is quite wastefull even if the button volume saves
some horizontal pixels. Don't you agree?

F-spot's zoom widget on the lower right corner is IMO misplaced but the
widget itself is even better than iTunes' due to the color use: longer
blue bar meaning higher volume, zoom, etc. The icons used may not be the
best for the zoom metaphor though.

The ideal widget would look like this[4] IMO.

This is only my opinion and I'm not even contributing a patch so I don't
really get to vote but thanks for considering anyway.

Rui

[1] http://glua.ua.pt/~rmatos/itunes7.png
[2] http://glua.ua.pt/~rmatos/f-spot.png
[3] http://glua.ua.pt/~rmatos/rhythmbox.png
[4] http://glua.ua.pt/~rmatos/ideal-widget.png

_______________________________________________
gnome-multimedia mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-multimedia
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBF8GzDXaUaaGdkBb0RAv7TAJ964qYYpe5p44Uni4oeSocCCOxHBQCfZBsz
e1I0KP4WwRNP3fBUlYCziyo=
=2cdJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.