Re: [Totem] Browser plugin gstreamer

Hmm you're right, it was about the web browser plugin, while i was thinking
about a separate video component.

Does anyone else mean a separate video component, or really a separate web
browser plugin? (I don't want to turn the discussion
point, just I'm not sure if not someone else maybe meant the same thing as
me.)

2008/9/9 Bastien Nocera <[email protected]>

> On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 15:20 +0200, Milosz Derezynski wrote:
> > I just wanted to add once again that i see a huge benefit in having a
> > generic browser plugin.
> >
> > Having Gtk+ code inside GST or even the plugin being part of GST is
> > certainly not the right way,
> > but having a reusable video component based on Gtk+ and GST Is IMO the
> > right way.
> >
> > For one of my apps, i copied big parts of the Totem video code in
> > order to have a well working
> > video widget.
> >
> > Certainly also it is somehow possible to have a generic video
> > component which Totem can also
> > reuse, even if with much work.
> >
> > If it could be agreed upon having this, i would be willing to stop
> > current projects of mine and work
> > towards separating the video component code.
> >
> > Thoughts?
>
> What does a web browser plugin have to do with re-using the video
> widget?
>
>
>


-- 
Please note that according to the German law on data retention,
information on every electronic information exchange with me is
retained for a period of six months.
[Bitte beachten Sie, dass dem Gesetz zur Vorratsdatenspeicherung zufolge
jeder elektronische Kontakt mit mir sechs Monate lang gespeichert wird.]

_______________________________________________
gnome-multimedia mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-multimedia